155 thoughts on “I Visited Burzynski’s Clinic Last Week – And I Do NOT Believe He Is A Quack!

  1. All the doctors are out for is money.. all of them… that movie cut & Burned is correct… I had stage 3 breast cancer, with a 5cm lump… I did not fit the profile of a breast cancer victim..I breast feed 4 girls, ate garli and onions, no cancer in my family.. but I was told i had cancer because I had a really good insurance company I went through 4 chemo treatments ( with the really bad drugs The one they call red devil) before I wised up I didnt even do the surgery.. my own doctor told me I was killing my self if i didnt finish treatment…I lost my hair never lost any weight, because I think god was watching over me.. anyway to make a long story short… I changed my enitre diet got off anything produced by man and went strictly vegan, and my cancer is GONE.. i have talked to other breast cancer patients who survived and did the same thing as me.. you dont need chemo to survive,.. we get scared when we hear the word CANCER in any form… doctors are not taught this they are just taught to hand out chemo.. GOD does not want you to go through something that is going to harm you I can gurantee you that .. put your faith in god and not man… i spent 100,000 on 4 treatments…. NOW you tell me the doctors and drug makers arent after our money… DO your research people…YES I STAKED MY LIFE ON IT.. sure did.. and i am still here to let others know, that you can survive but only if you really want to change your life..

  2. I wanted to take the time to thank the Crazy Pharamcist for posting his thoughts. I really appreciate it. It’s important for regular people to say what they think. I felt your comments were honest and helpful.

    After seeing both Burzynski movies (I highly recommend them to all) I am firmly in the “I believe Dr Burzynski and I want access to Antineoplastons” camp. If I ever had cancer that would be the first treatment I would want to try. The Gerson therapy would be next. Both non-toxic. I want the right to chose my treatment. Even if the treatment I choose is supposedly snake oil to some, if it’s non toxic, then what’s the big deal? It’s my money, why can’t I spend it on what I want. Why wouldn’t everyone try the non toxic treatments first and then , and only then, resort to the really crazy highly toxic treatments of chemo and radiation. I’m not sure why it bothers the naysayers so much.

    It upsets me that Antineoplastons are not available. I do believe they are being suppressed on purpose because big pharma doesn’t want to lose millions and the FDA is corrupt. I am mad as hell at the FDA. I’d like the head of the FDA to be prosecuted and put in jail for corruption and violating the public trust. The FDA should be protecting society, but instead it’s protecting big pharma. It’s a complete betrayal.

    I have clicked on about 30 different websites about Burzynski, trying to keep an open mind. Some of the sites which are against Burzynski (they have a right to their opinion) are downright nasty. Angry/nasty. They are so nasty, it does make me think that these people are paid to do it. That’s my opinion.

    Someone took the time to film 2 documentaries to show the injustice and the suppression by the industry. Why would someone take the time and money to make a film if it was just snake oil? Have you seen any good 2 hour snake oil films lately? I haven’t. Watch the movie Bursynski 1 and 2 and decide for yourself.

    My last comment is about all of the people saying that Burzynski hasn’t proved that his treatments work, or that he hasn’t satisfied the scientific method. I’m not a scientist, but they address this exact issue near the end of the Burzynski 2 movie. I hope more people will talk about it. They show a Japanese doctor/scientist who did his own antineoplaston trial and showed that it was effective. He talks about how he’s not allowed to release his study due to industry pressures. They show Burzynski saying that “proving” is very complicated, and to do it the way the FDA wants: many patients getting the exact same treatment, they might die because each person’s treatment should be tailored to fit just them. There was the Chinese scientist who left communist China because he was not allowed to speak his mind. And when he get’s to America and sees corruption and suppression of data he really had to think hard and long if he was going to speak his mind, because it was career suicide. He decided that it was more important to speak the truth, than have a good career. What he wanted us to know, and made a big career sacrifice to tell us, was that antineoplastons-work.

    Make up your own mind, but I want antineoplastons available for all, and the FDA to go to hell. Oh, and the insurance companies too. I hope more people will comment about the Burzynski movies.
    Leigh Anderson
    October 2013
    Chicago

  3. Who does the baking soda treatment I live in the buffalo new york area my brother was just diagnosed with bladder cancer and prostate cancer . Please help.

  4. As a crazy pharmacist myself, I question the use of many medications and advocate natural therapies (especially Vitamin D). I have recently been diagnosed with breast cancer & reading Suzanne Somers book “Knockout”. The peptides make sense. I want in. Some medications of course are helpful- ACE-Inhibitors prevent renal disease in diabetics, statins (new guidelines with lower doses) preventing cardiac disease… make sure you are an informed patient. Doctors are being pulled in all sorts of directions. I believe most mean well, but it is your life.

  5. Hi Matt,
    I just came across this article & started reading the comments ..It is easy to be a skeptic.. one should be..I believe all resources should be looked at & weighed of course all resources can be debated.
    I know you don’t me..But close friends mine had WONDERFUL results with Dr. B. Jack & Marianne Kunarri have a son Dustin he is now in his 20s & just recently got married. When Dustin was 2yrs old he diagnosis with a deadly brain tumor.. They fought congress as well as others he was able to get Dr. Bs treaments WITHOUT chemo.. but it was a fight.. his treatment s do work.. There is never 100% guarantee with any treatment. The FDA has set it up that for anyone to see Dr. B you have to have started chemo.. double edged sword there because chemo kills all your cells including the good ones so by the time you get to Dr. B or with Dr. B your cure rate is like 30% verses 60% & above …Its as almost tho the FDA doesn’t want you cured they have st it up as a catch 22..Dustin had side effects from the treatment that he received & he is cured..Another thing like to point its expensive because of without FDA approval insurance maybe wont cover it…I want to respond to you & encourage you to Google Dustin Kunarri he is a neat young man and a real person.
    thank you.

  6. Is this the quality doctor you’re talking about: http://www.reportingonhealth.org/2014/01/12/qa-liz-szabo-braving-legal-threats-investigate-medical-folk-hero

    The doctor does not mind patients going through mindless chemo JUST to get his treatment. Quality of peptides depends on quality of the animals used (animal pee). But I have never really seen him being transparent with regards to the source of the pee.

    Did anyone asks what has he not given to the FDA? If he is a true hero, he would have made the treatments for affordable.

    I will quote something by someone else of which I am in total agreement with:
    “Burzynski’s 60+ trials failed to provide support for his claim antineoplastons are effective, but he’s deliberately concealing that fact in order to continue attracting clients willing to pay exorbitant fees to receive treatment at his hands. In which case he’s a fraud peddling hope he knows to be false.
    The only other possibility I can envision is that the trials DO indicate that antineoplastons safely and effectively treat advanced stage cancers, but he’s witholding publication to maintain a monopoly on the treatment, thereby deliberately and knowingly denying millions of cancer patients access to a cure for his own financial gain. In which case he’s a monster.”

  7. Nancy,
    My husband is T4N1 Gleason 9 prostate cancer. Given the life span of 18-24 months Nov 2009. It had spread all over his prostate, wall of his bladder, seminal vesicles, the area around te to state and in a lymph node. No options other than Lupron and radiation. Neither were considered a cure, just to improve the quality of his life and slow his very aggressive cancer down. He will tell you not to skip conventionl medicine. I found Vernon, “Vito’s” site using baking soda to kill cancer.
    Long story short, he followed the baking soda regime for 10 days. He typically eats mostly vegetables and almonds, a little chicken and fish. He can’t digest red meat, that’s from the radiation.
    He does his baking soda thing about every 6-8 weeks. The rest of the time he eats and drinks whatever. He doctors took him off Lupron to see what would happen. His testosterone has increased to a normal level, for his age (61) and his PSA is .2, which his urology oncologist thinks is great as he still has a prostate. It would be considered a failure if he had his prostate removed. So far, he’s beating the projections for one with his grade cancer.
    His drs are interested in being soda, but without clinical trials, it’s not protocol so they can’t recommend it to patients.
    He gave the baking soda protocol he follows to a friend’s husband who is on watchful waiting. He did it. The follow-up biopsy, no cancer.
    Oh, scans my husband had, no cancer. We know a few more successful cancer cases.
    People who think this is too simple…..one day someone was chewing on the bark of a tree and his headache went away…asprin. Mold on bread…penicillin .
    The baking soda thing is easy to do. Do it for 10 days. Vito’s website has changed quite a bit since I saw it in January 2010. But, what he did is still there. Phkillscancer.com
    Forget the garbage about the wacko Siminelli in Italy.
    I know this post is late and hope you get to see it.

  8. It is always easy to say they (the geniuses of our time) are idiots or quacks! After all
    Albert Einstein was an uneducated idiot with no formal education. Galileo was the biggest idiot of all – The audacity of him saying that the earth revolved around the sun. What an f-ing joke! The earth is the center of our galaxy and the sun revolves around us!
    In reality our own government is owned not by the people any longer. Instead it is owned by the largest and most powerful (corrupt) corporations.

    Now that I have your attention, forget about what you are taught to say or think and pull your head out of the sand and think for yourself. Sure there are a lot of quacks and crooks looking to make a quick buck out there. I am sure you are innocent of this as well! We all need to make a living and something new, such as a business, needs funding in order to survive and expand. The government will not fund anything that does not fit in with their constituents plans. i.e. big government funding! Anything that threatens that also threatens the CEO their investors of their lucrative lifestyle. WHY FIND A CURE WHEN WE CAN LIVE LIKE THIS! WHO CARES IF THESE PEOPLE DIE, THEY ARE EXPENDIBLE! BESIDES THERE ARE MORE WHERE THEY COME FROM AND IT DOESN’T COST US A DIME!

    Dr. Burzynski can’t get federal funding like the greedy corporations get. So in order for him to expand and increase funds for extensive research he needs to charge for the services. But one day he could be heralded as the one who did what no other doctor could or would do for humanity. So do not dismiss him as a quack as so many had done with others that gave us the technologies, vaccines (cures), and discoveries we take for granted and use today.

    As for Matt – WAKE UP DUMMY!

  9. which drug company is paying you. I wonder what it would cost people if the government subsidized burzynski like it does drug companies. what drug companies are charging for there drugs is robbery so you can go back to those paying you and climb back up their ass

  10. Many cures of cancers have emerged many times such as the Royal Rife, Essiac Tea and then Light Cell therapy experiment, in 2008 at NIHA they conducted and experiment that cured all the mice that had cancer and did not damage any of the surrounding tissue. It was a brilliant success so they pulled the plug on it. How come DMSO combined with 1/10 chemo work together and only target cancer cells and again doesn’t damage the healthy tissue? An MD was doing exactly this with his patients successfully treating them and of course he is no longer practicing medicine

    Burzinksky fight is to give people safer options and giving them at a chance of life…..he is fighting for humanity .

    The question is who has to power to halt cures that would end human suffering ? Who benefits from that …motivation, opportunity it is simple equation just follow whoever is saying “showing me the money” and the answer will be there somewhere

    Now imagine a group of people living in a village that don’t ever get cancer ever! A herd of scientist were sent to figure out why .
    They all ate a natural item that cost five cents . This was ground breaking, but did that make it on the cover of any paper? An attempt was made to make sure that five cent item was not permitted to be imported here , but that didn’t work because it was natural safe item
    This is a true story.

    Now show me the money people… if all of their grandchildren all had cancer they would ask for big a truck load delivery of this five cent item .

    People need to get educated on their options for cancer ….well you need to know your options because if the time comes you need to make an
    informed decision.

    To me chemo is from the dark ages, the MD giving you something so toxic so poisonous and if your body survives the poisoning well you’ve won the battle but you might have side effects and decrease your life to five years. One day doctor will look back at this practice and shake their heads.

  11. FDA IS ONLY PROTECTING THE CHEMO/RADIATION/PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, WHICH ALL HAVE TOO MUCH MONEY INVESTED IN “CURING” CANCER.
    I CAN’T BELIEVE FDA HAS ALSO FORBIDDEN BYRZINSKI TO RECEIVE PRIVATE DONATIONS TO FURTHER HIS RESEARCH!!!

  12. FDA WORKS FOR THE BENEFIT OF BIG FOOD AND PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES. EVER WONDER WHY CANCER PROBLEMS KEEP INCREASING IN NUMBERS?? HOW IS AN ORGANIC HUMAN BODY SUPPOSE TO KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH A SYNTHESIZED LABORATORY INGREDIENT OR AN ARTIFICIAL FOOD INGREDIENT OR PRESERVATIVE?????

  13. Gee, how totally . . . epcexted. Thanks for the writeup though. Burzynski may call himself a swan, but so far it looks to me like he quacks like a duck and walks like a duck. or perhaps more to the point he ducks like a quack.

  14. There are different onoptis and though they all have side effects, he should look into radioactive implants. They are tiny seeds which do not harm those around him and seem to be better than the surgical resection and/ or radiation. He just needs to have a explanation of all the onoptis and statistics. If he is older like 70 it progresses less quickly.

  15. As a small business owner if I had fight legal battles against as powerful group as FDA and NCI etc for last 30 years my services will be very expensive too.
    In my opinion every single cancer patiences should have constitutional right to choose their own doctors and treatments and insurance companies should pay for it.
    The current situation makes me so angry.
    The human lives should worth more than personal egos of those burocrats or the bottom lines of those pahrma companies.

  16. “What is your motivation to discredit Burzynski?” – Warning other people that he is a quack so that they don’t throw their savings at him, that is the motivation.
    Really, why do you ask? Lots of good statements here. You might disagree with them but the intention is obvious.
    P.S.: Ever seen his humble little home? http://www.tanoro.com/images/burzynski-home-map-sm.png

  17. It is not at all a list of studies from the National Cancer Institute.
    It is a list of publications on Antineoplastons on the website of the National Cancer Institute.
    Not studies, not their work, nothing that proves efficacy.
    If you have a study that proves the efficacy, please tell us which one and where you found it.

  18. Yes Phil. Writing in capitals makes it true. Doesn’t even need proof anymore 😛

  19. Is that so Rutryin? Really? Or maybe we just have more cases of cancer because people live a hell of a lot longer these days than they did a hundred years ago?

  20. Always funny. No evidence at all yet absolutely sure that anybody disagreeing is a shill. So everybody is lying and cheating and just out for the money? Then why is it so obvious to you, that Dr. Burzynski is the big exception to your rule? Really, why? Any reason at all?

    P.S.: Unfortunately I don’t get paid by big Pharma. But would love to.
    Big Pharma: please consider this my application ;-P

  21. Dear Lisa
    That’s a bit on the naive side, isn’t it? If there was this miracle cure with just some vegetable drinks and even clinics (although not in the US), don’t you think this cure would be used all over the world? Regardless of what Bad Big Pharma says or outlaws?
    Pot is illegal yet people around the world don’t care at all. Don’t you think they’d care even less about the FDA if it was about curing their cancer?
    And don’t get me started about the FDA suppressing the formula. You’ve read it on the interwebs, they could simply post it there.

  22. 1. “You idiots” – Are you able to have a debate like an adult?
    2. “is in Phase IV […] correct?” – Not correct. It is in phase III.
    3. “MEANING THAT THE FDA HAS CONCEDED THEIR EFFICACY” – Wrong again, see above.
    4. ” EVERYONE admits that Burzynski’s treatment is not harmful.” – And once more, just plain wrong. Toxic reactions, severe to life threatning, see: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofGlobalRegulatoryOperationsandPolicy/ORA/ORAElectronicReadingRoom/UCM373967.pdf
    5. “THEN WHY CAN’T THE GOVERNMENT GET OUT OF THE WAY and let parents try to save their children any way possible.” – Because this results in parents getting exploited by quacks and giving them drugs that are not only useless but life threatning? See above.
    Anything else I can help you with?

  23. Dear meera a.

    Short answer: Don’t take her there.

    Long answer: seemingly the only way to get into the actual trials is having a certain type of brain cancer with every conventional treatement possibility exhausted. However, even if the drug actually worked (which doesn’t seem likely), she would have to be in a Phase III trial for positive results (again, even if; there are none to be expected).
    Conventional therapy (which is what they provide if you don’t get into a trial) can be done much cheaper at other institutions.
    So, no, don’t take her there. If conventional therapy options are exhausted, ask your oncologist about other trials that are actually promising and haven’t run without any usable results for ten years.
    Best of luck to you and your mom!

  24. Just to let everyone know a treatment for tumors I had in my nose that had my airways in both nostrils plugged up. I got rid of them while trying to clean out my arteries to my heart after a bout with heart disease. My doctor tried for over a year to get me to have surgery which I did not want. In my protocol I ate 2 pints of blueberries a week and drank a half a gallon of diet cranberry juice and with in six months I noticed that I could breath better. I asked another doctor to look up my nose and he told me it was clear as a whistle. A few months later I saw my nose, ear and throat doctor for another problem and told him to look in and he was shocked to see not even a trace of the tumors and he then asked me how I got rid of them. He told me later that he now tells his patients that have these tumors my story before he does surgery if they want to try it. There is other hope for people out here.

  25. Great for Dustin. You’ve missed Matt’s point entirely though. No evidence. Evidence is a fair test of a drug. Are more people cured on the drug + standard care vs. standard care alone? One “cured” person is not evidence, it’s an anecdote at best, arguably an urban legend. The simpler explanation is that Dustin was cured before he walked into the Burzynski Clinic. Unfortunately, Burzynski doesn’t feel an obligation to rigorously test his drugs or to publish his work, so we’ll never really know.

  26. So it wasn’t the Lupron, or the radiation that your husband was receiving in parallel to the baking soda that drove his cancer into remission, it was the baking soda? How do you know that?

  27. “still I would think burzynski would want this approved and mass distributed”
    Sure he would, just like any other drug company like his would. But ANPs are ineffective against cancers, so he can’t actually complete the trials he’s been approved to do, because then he’s out of business.

  28. BURZYNSKI RESEARCH INSTITUTE IS PART OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY. HE GETS A “DONATION” FROM EVERY PATIENT HE TREATS. HE’S JUST A FRAUD. NO AMOUNT OF CAPITAL LETTERS WILL CHANGE THAT. WHY ARE WE YELLING?

  29. One word sums this up & a lot more others, GREED & yes WE the people vote the IDIOT’s in who make the laws

  30. Plz help! My 16 yr old grand daughter was just diagnosed with Hodgkin’s lymphoma. She has a mass on her spleen, collar bone, fluid around 1 lung that has decreased it’s six and function to 1/2 the size of her other lung, a mass or masses in her chest cavity and enlarged liver. I am an LPN and LOATH the thought of chemo and radiation due to it’s deadly side effects. I know that your time is very precious but I would ask you to send ANY info you have about Burzynski’s treatments, antineoplastins therapy, or other alternative treatments for cancer. They want to start chemo and radiation NOW so time is crucial!!!! Plz help!!! May God bless you and your child and send PEACE to each of you. Thanks in advance.

  31. You are a ignorant excuse!! If you have never been there or treated who are you to judge? FDA employee? i figure

  32. I’ve had many patients travel to Texas for the miracle horse urine cure offered by SB. Kids with brain tumors. The ones antineoplastins are supposed to work for. Not a single one is alive today. Their families, however, are all a whole lot poorer.

    Stan and his fans crack me up. The movie is a hoot. Without the internet he’d be just another shyster, but instead he’s a world-renowned quack. I can only hope he is enjoying this life. There will come a day of reckoning …

  33. Please tell me why then that cancer rates have exponentially increased among the 20-30 age group? Have they lived too long? Parents are now routinely burying their young adult children or for that matter their older adult children. It is not always the elderly that end up with the cancer.

  34. Let me ask you one question what is the success rate of chemo therapy? What side effects can you get from this treatment by putting toxins and treatment killing good and bad cells and your body has to fight infection this treatment makes no sense at all…to fry people’s body parts ,I think it’s a disgrace in the technology age we have today. The only reason why people use it it’s a last home and cheap to pay because it’s subsidised and it’s old technology. The system stinks and people should have choices not be put through and watch love ones to be tortured in this way with no dignity. Money plays a huge part in medicine and they love the rewards with cancer fund raising,research grants,government subsidies the PDA does not want to let go of this it’s power and control. They should be embracing people with New ideas but because it’s not their own idea they ridicule like they do with every good inventor or scientist who wants to make a difference in people’s lives. Please explain the benefits of chemo and percentages of people who survive and I believe that the cancer does come back even after survival however the next time it’s strikes faster than the first. If people don’t die from chemo they die from infections or mal practice in hospitals.
    One more thing we forget how many people ever stood up in court and said that chemo was the best thing for them and they can live normal lives without feeling like a rat in a laboratory. People who said their story on Burynski DVD where genuine and emotional and believed that it cured and they saw with their eyes that it worked now that is an endorsement for any New product if you wanted to buy with real people and real stories.
    The PDA has a lot to answer for with their bullish and a lot of hot air to treat humans like lab rats.

  35. Let me ask you one question what is the success rate of chemo therapy? What side effects can you get from this treatment by putting toxins and treatment killing good and bad cells and your body has to fight infection this treatment makes no sense at all…to fry people’s body parts ,I think it’s a disgrace in the technology age we have today. The only reason why people use it it’s a last hoped and cheap to pay because it’s subsidised and it’s old technology. The system stinks and people should have choices not be put through and watch love ones to be tortured in this way with no dignity. Money plays a huge part in medicine and they love the rewards with cancer fund raising,research grants,government subsidies the PDA does not want to let go of this it’s power and control. They should be embracing people with New ideas but because it’s not their own idea they ridicule like they do with every good inventor or scientist who wants to make a difference in people’s lives. Please explain the benefits of chemo and percentages of people who survive and I believe that the cancer does come back even after survival however the next time it’s strikes faster than the first. If people don’t die from chemo they die from infections or mal practice in hospitals.
    One more thing we forget how many people ever stood up in court and said that chemo was the best thing for them and they can live normal lives without feeling like a rat in a laboratory. People who said their story on Burynski DVD where genuine and emotional and believed that it cured and they saw with their eyes that it worked now that is an endorsement for any New product if you wanted to buy with real people and real stories.
    The PDA has a lot to answer for with their bullshit and a lot of hot air to treat humans like lab rats.

  36. Right let me put things together. Someone here mentioned that antineoplastins are created from a horse pee??? Plus maybe combinated with phenylbut. So if that treatment really works for those brain tumour affected people then why don’t you anyone with cancer try to drink that horse pee? I know it sounds discussting but hey what about if this cheap therapy will work? Myself I had very bad acne in my teenage and nothing helped me at all after my friend said to me to try to put child’s pee on my face so as I had not child that time I puted my own and you know what? It worked I get rid of my acne. So that’s why am thinking about Burzynski pee treatment that actually it could work. It’s been a week when some lump was found on my father’s lung. It’s 14 mm and its at the bottom of his right lung. Don’t know yet if positive or negative so they sent him now to biopsy ct scan but he is worry about that with this treatment they will awake asleep cysts and doesn’t want to know that is positive and scared about chemo and radiation and passing away 🙁 after this reading I will let him know about SB and maybe he will be the first who will try that nasty thing either anyone of you. I think a pint of beer with a half cup of HP will not make him sick lol. Anyway thanks for any suggestions on n this site.
    Good luck and be healthy…

  37. This post is going to be cut and paste to several forums.

    This post would have been hard for me to write a few months ago, because I sincerely believed that although I had a negative experience at the Burzynsky Clinic, I still believed he was a good man with a promising cancer treatment, therefore I did not want to say anything that would deter anyone from seeking his treatment.

    Now Im pissed. Let the shaming begin. This man stole my money and is %100 responsible for me not being able to seek any other medication for my cancer.

    Long story as short as possible. I am a 34 year old mother of two small children with stage four breast cancer. After very very careful research I decided to fly from Canada to Texas to seek Burzynski’s treatment. Now please keep in mind I had a very small, two month premature baby boy at home and so was ADAMANT to their administration that I would NOT do chemo/radiation or surgery, and to please not make me leave my family for several weeks if that was all they were going to offer. They PROMISED that even if I didn’t qualify for anti-neoplatons, that I would be treated with the gene targeted therapy and NO chemo.

    I also asked if they had everything they needed medical wise (CAT scans / MRI/ Blood etc) as those things are covered in Canada, and If they needed more information than they had, I would get the scans here.

    No, they have everything they need was the answer. EFFING lies.

    So I fly down, and pay them $20,000 UP FRONT for care. I am immediately told to go get scans (thousands of dollars) from the people THEY recommend. Interesting.

    Lets skip forward a week…I am brought into the office and told I don’t qualify for anti-neoplastons. “what do you offer me then,” was the question.
    “surgery, radiation and chemo” was their answer.

    When I repeated that I was against the standard care, and only believed in alternative, Greg Burzynsky tells me “they don’t recommend alternative therapies.” I am shocked and tell them they ARE alternative, to which I am greeted with silence, a huff, and a look of annoyance.

    All of that is forgivable. Shit happens. What is not forgivable is that I was promised a full reimbursement of my $20,000 last September 2015. At the time of me writing this it is almost February 2016.

    I called their office once or twice a week for MONTHS….with NO response. I left emails without one reply. Not once.
    I left messages with the head of their finance department , Patrick, PLEADING for the money so that I could continue with cancer therapy here at home. I left messages CRYING that I was a young mother given six months to live…and without my money I could NOT get any further treatments as that was all the money I had.

    Nothing.

    Two months ago I did finally receive a call from Patrick saying the funds were on their way. That was the only phone call. No money. They have a dozen emails from me, not one response. Now the panic has set in with the realization that this “great” man….this “hero”…this man who says the FDA is responsible for the death of many of his patients because they deny them access to his medicine…is in fact responsible for a young mother not being able to access further medical care.

    The burzynsky clinic lied to me…got me there under false pretences, then stole tens of thousands of dollars. Im sure in time, with expensive lawyers I will get the money back. But by then it may be to late. Perhaps I will have it in time to cover funeral expenses. And that is not meant for dramatic effect, that is the honest truth.

  38. Einstein had a PhD, Copernicus (not Gallileo) started heliocentrism, and the Burzynski Clinic is a corporation. Burzynski’s trials have a green light from the FDA and his patients pay for their own treatment, so why does he need funding exactly? Also, the federal govenment doesn’t fund drug trials, not for “big greedy corporations”, and not for small greedy corporations like the Burzynski clinic. Pretty much everything you said is false, so who’s the dummy?

  39. So let me get this right – you are certain that antineoplastons work for cancer because they’re found in urine, and urine cleared up your acne?

  40. The crazy thing is that True Believers will ignore your story in favor of anecdotes that confirm their beliefs. Why is it so hard to believe that Burzynski, a guy who’s known to be dishonest in business, is also a dishonest doctor/scientist?

  41. I would like to point out the incestuous relationship between Big Pharma and the FDA. This is so very easy to research. The former CEOs of large pharmaceutical companies have been appointed to run the FDA and then after they leave the government position, they go right back to work for a pharmaceutical company. I find this practice sleazy because they are obviously heavily biased. I work in a doctors office and have looked up theses “studies” in the favored periodicals. Every one has been disingenuous in the approach and reporting results has multiple holes. I do not have a PhD nor any other degree to wave around. I only know that I have had enough education to the human body, the necessity of good nutrition and when the drug reps come into our office, I can understand every word. I don’t believe the results they tout as they are only parroting what is fed to them from the “mother ship”. Why is it that almost every MD program at the nationwide universities does not require a semester or two of nutrition? I will explain, because the pharmaceutical industry is funding the programs throughout the country and they have been allowed to dictate the curriculum. You think this is false information, I dare you to research it with a critical eye. I suspect you, yourself work for one of the major drug producing criminals.
    Yes, I say criminals because they bully any other individual who has a safer solution is bullied out of existence or heavily controlled by the FDA AKA Big Pharma. The results of the so called studies performed on the latest drug are skewed. The number of “success” are heavily inflated. Whistle blowers have indeed come forward. Why doesn’t the mainstream media report it? Well, why didn’t the mainstream media report that all four of the Civil Rights Bills were only passed because over 80% of Republicans voted in favor while an average of 18% of Democrats voted in favor. Why do the history books (written by significantly left leaning professors) give credit to the Democrats? I just wanted you to think rather than repeat what you been told to believe.

  42. John, do you have ANY understanding of human physiology? My guess is, no. Since you don’t understand how the body works, your response is moot. It demonstrates true ignorance.

  43. I think a jackass is a person who uses an incomplete story about a child with cancer to support his/her flawed logic.

  44. Right, you have to have been a patient of Burzynski’s to know if ANPs cure cancer.

    That reminds me, I have discovered that drinking motor oil cures cancer. By your logic, you HAVE to believe me because you’ve never tried drinking motor oil to cure cancer.

    OMG, EVERYONE’s a shill here, aren’t they?

Comments are closed.